<p dir="ltr">Great to hear you were/are planing to hook up some dividers to the ADC!</p>
<p dir="ltr">Using more resistors and more ADC channels seems fine. Having the code ready by next month isn't an issue to me, it would be easy for more contributors to join (like myself) once the hardware design is settled/settling-down.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Jun 13, 2016 7:09 AM, "John Griessen" <<a href="mailto:john@industromatic.com">john@industromatic.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On 06/13/2016 12:53 AM, Nathan McCorkle wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I would really like to capture have the ability to<br>
capture the waveform.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Sure, I'll get that feature built into the design, but I can't guarantee it will be coded by July 15th.<br>
Probably it will get done later and need to be loaded into the machine micropython style.<br>
<br>
I'm not seeing the need for a programmable gain amplifier. They can give you good feedback control,<br>
and good signal to noise ratio, but the calibrating and recording of HV pulses can be done with channels of ADC.<br>
Set one up for one gain, and second one up for a different gain et voila.<br>
<br>
John<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
open_electroporator mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:open_electroporator@cibolo.us" target="_blank">open_electroporator@cibolo.us</a><br>
<a href="http://cibolo.us/mailman/listinfo/open_electroporator" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://cibolo.us/mailman/listinfo/open_electroporator</a><br>
</blockquote></div>