[Open_electroporator] Open ultrasound imaging project/ electroporator
William Beeson
beesonwt at gmail.com
Sun Jun 12 14:16:20 UTC 2016
Thanks for this John. Will look it over and provide any feedback to the
list.
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 6:09 PM, John Griessen <john at industromatic.com>
wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 04:58 PM, Bryan Bishop wrote:
>
>> Yeah I understand your preference about not wanting cash debt, it makes
>> sense to me. Equity would be more the name of the game
>> from my perspective :-). I don't care so much about a writeup regarding
>> who might buy/why, target demographic seems obvious. But
>> equity regarding kit sales (or whatever) etc would be interesting.
>>
>
> I've written up a proposal with an agreement to pay back as product sells
> per product, which
> is not exactly the same concept as equity. I have no corporation to give
> share divvies of.
> This is for an open hardware product that anyone can copy, so the product
> lifecycle depends on
> how good your cost-reduction-design is more than performance design, and
> even then it is going to
> be short and on to another improved version of it. I won't offer a
> percentage of the profits from
> following improved products, just the v1.0 as at the end of this project
> product, which is
> spelled out in the proposal libre office doc attached.
>
> John Griessen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open_electroporator mailing list
> open_electroporator at cibolo.us
> http://cibolo.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/open_electroporator
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cibolo.us/pipermail/open_electroporator/attachments/20160612/9e44529c/attachment.html>
More information about the open_electroporator
mailing list